● Under the old IAEA safeguards, all NPT signatories would specify their nuclear sites and IAEA would carry out inspections in the specified sites. Thus, IAEA, under the old safeguards, could only carry out inspection for unauthorised activities only at designated or specified sites declared by a country. This basically left an option open for states to carry out covert nuclear programmes - as it happened in case of Iraq. ● Thus, in 1993, the IAEA designed Additional Protocols (AP) to tighten the existing safeguarding regime. ● However, India specific Additional Protocols (AP) do not give IAEA the right to hinder or interfere with activities which are outside the scope of India's safeguard agreements, thus recognizing that India reserves a right to a military nuclear program outside IAEA agreement. From this description, C and D are irrelevant, and B is Wrong. Thus we are left with answer(A)